Chapter 4 – Automobile
Injury Claims
Introduction
-
Auto policies provide
coverage for both first party and third party (TP) injury claims
-
First party coverages
are found under the Accident Benefits (AB) section
-
TP coverages are found
under the Liability section
-
Auto policy wordings
are mandated by provincial law
-
The auto policy
wordings within each province are standard wordings for all who purchase auto
insurance
Auto TP Bodily Injury
(BI)
-
Coverage is provided
for both property damage (PD) and BI to those persons who have suffered injuries
or damages to their property as a result of the insured's negligence
-
In provinces where a
no-fault AB apply, TP liability (TPL) will be applicable only under certain
circumstances; the injury of the claimant will usually be set against a
criteria before any coverage under this section can be applied
-
In provinces where TPL
is government run, the policy will respond differently
-
In provinces where
no-fault system doesn't apply, then ordinary rules of tort will apply
Accident Benefits (AB)
-
Provides coverages for:
·
Medical expenses
·
Wage loss
·
Rehabilitation
·
Death & funeral
benefits
·
Other personal care
expenses like caregiver, housekeeping, home maintenance
-
Level of benefits will
vary from province to province
-
AB is mandatory in all
provinces except Newfoundland and Labrador
-
AB is referred to as "no-fault" benefits because
coverage will apply regardless of fault of the insured for the motor vehicle
accident (MVA)
-
The purpose for
"no-fault" benefits is to provide all insureds access to benefits
with the purpose of rehabilitation for all claimants being the primary
objective
-
In QC, there is no
opportunity for claimants to sue negligent party for injuries sustained; all claimants must go through SAAQ for their
AB
-
In provinces allowing
tort action and having AB "no-fault", any award for damages under TPL
will be deducted for any benefits available under the AB section
-
AB is secondary to any
benefits available to the claimants through their own employer insurance,
government health plans, and long-term disability plans
-
The medical knowledge
an adjuster must have in-order to assess auto injury claims are:
·
Medical terminology
·
Optimum course
treatment
·
Limitations an injury
is likely to impose
·
How long a person will
be affected by the injury under the circumstances
Provincial Auto Injury
Regimes
-
Refer to table for
summary of all provinces & territories and their corresponding coverages
Ontario (Not in the
Table)
-
The insurer has the
benefit of closing the claim file, and the claimant has the benefit of receiving
one lump sum instead of a series of payments over a long period of time
- Commuted Value
- amount that it would take today to pay off an accrued benefit that is due in
the future
- interest rates are an essential component thus projections cannot be guaranteed
- interest rates are an essential component thus projections cannot be guaranteed
-
Even if the injured
party was in the process of committing a crime, the insurer still has to pay
statutory AB (Beattie v. National
Frontier Insurance Company)
Out-of-Province
Claims
-
Out-of-province
accidents require the loss adjuster to investigate if the provinces have a
reciprocal agreement to determine claims handling process
-
Example - ON and QC
have an agreement between them to use IBC settlement charts to determine fault
for MVAs; QC residents involved in MVAs
outside of QC are governed by the law of jurisdiction where the MVA occurred -
i.e. if QC driver was negligent then they could be sued for any resulting BI or
PD suffered by the innocent TP; QC residents are covered for their injuries due
to MVAs anywhere in the world through SAAQ, regardless of fault
Injury
Claim Process
-
Claims process does not
have much variation for auto injury claims
- It
is important for the adjuster to meet with the injured party ASAP after the
claim has been filed because:
·
Need to get the most
accurate details of the accident
·
Need to get the most
accurate details of the injury suffered by the claimants
·
Need to get the most
accurate details of the claimant's activities
·
Need to get the most
accurate details of the claimant's employment history
-
Once a claimant retains
a lawyer it will be difficult to get any more information and the chance to
reserve the file properly will be lost
-
A serious injury may
take a lot of time to resolve; the settlement amount for an injury that will
heal versus an injury that will cause a permanent handicap will be very
different
-
The expenses that have
to be reviewed by the adjuster for claims involving injury are:
·
Physiotherapy
·
Medical aids
·
Prosthetic devices
·
Prescription drugs
·
Chiropractic expenses
·
Dental treatments
-
These incurred expenses
must be reasonable and necessary and related to the accident
-
Rehabilitation (rehab)
is a tool used to improve the odds that a claimant will return to work
successfully in the shortest amount of time
-
Rehab process generally
requires a plan of action that involves:
·
Assessments
·
Goal setting
·
Planning
·
Training
·
Placement
·
Follow - up
·
Address any factors
that may inhibit or slow recovery
-
The expenses that have
to be reviewed by the adjuster for claims involving rehabilitation are:
·
Treatment services such
as guidance and counselling services
·
Training services
·
Special equipment
needed by the claimant
-
Studies have shown that
claimants that suffer from soft tissue injuries will likely recover more
quickly when they follow a regime of exercise and activity
-
Information gathered by
the adjuster about the claimant should include:
·
Physical
characteristics
·
Party's age
·
Gender
·
Marital status
·
Number of dependents
·
Nature of employment
·
Details of their income
or salary
·
Prior health issues
·
Regular physical activity
prior to the loss
-
Medical information
about the claimant's injury should include:
·
Effects of accident
·
Prior health issues
·
Probable duration of
any inability to perform usual functions (documentation must be provided by
family doctor to support any time off work)
·
Probability of
permanent disability
-
The adjuster should
also note if any out-of-pocket expenses were incurred by the claimant as a
result of the accident like, medical expenses, transportation expenses, and
home care expenses
-
For wage loss claims
that are being presented for weekly income replacement, due to the claimant's inability
to work, the adjuster must confirm that the claimant's employment falls within
the definition of "employed" as stated in the policy
-
Permission from the
claimant is required, and the adjuster usually gets an authorization form
signed by the claimant prior to investigating and confirming the details of
the claimant's employment
-
The adjuster should
also investigate if the claimant is entitled to receive any collateral
benefits, as auto AB is secondary to any employer benefits; also, if the AB can be reduced by any
collateral benefits available to the insured
-
The criteria for
collecting lost wages from AB coverage varies from province to province
-
Initially the test
generally states that the insured must be unable to perform the duties usual to
his/her occupation or employment
-
After a period of time
the test changes to measure the ability to do any occupation or employment
which the insured is reasonably suited for
-
If the claimant's
disability period is longer than those of claimants who have experienced
comparable injuries the insurer has the right to request an independent medical
examination by a doctor of the insurer's choice
-
The adjuster may visit
the injured party to assess their daily activity and the progress of their
recovery
-
In extreme cases, a
private investigator can be hired to do surveillance of the claimant to
validate the disability or expose any fraudulent activity
-
The adjuster should
obtain medical and employer authorization forms to the claimant who is injured
as a result of the MVA and still living;
the adjuster will not be able to access the medical and employer
information without a signed authorization form from the claimant
-
Understanding the
medical issues will allow the adjuster to evaluate whether there is enough
evidence in the file to make a decision on the claim; the adjuster to should ask informed questions
to assess if there is enough evidence, like:
·
How long after the
accident did the symptoms appear for the claimant?
·
Did claimant have an
existing medical condition?
·
If claimant had a
pre-existing medical condition, was it made worse due to the accident?
·
Are there different
types of disorders, and does a specific permutation apply to the claimant?
·
Is there objective
findings to support the injury claimed?
If not, what are the subjective complaints of the claimant and are they
consistent with the medical diagnosis?
·
If the claimant hasn't
responded to traditional treatment, are aggressive, invasive methods of
treatment needed, like surgery?
·
Is the medical
professional diagnosing the claimant's injuries appropriately skilled to do so?
-
In Ontario, the
claimant has the right to see all medical information pertaining to him/her
that has been collected in the claims file
-
Quebec study found that
for whiplash and soft tissue injuries, the use of a cervical collar, traction
and extended bed rest can actually delay recovery and contribute to the
development of chronic pain
-
When the insured succumbs
to their injuries as a result of a MVA, then death benefits are paid; documentation that is required to pay a claim
under death and funeral benefits are:
·
Death certificate
·
Medical report
supporting the fact the insured succumb to his/her injuries as a result of the
MVA
·
Marriage certificate
-
Information that should
be collected and analysed for Fatalities involving MVAs are:
I.
Pre-existing
conditions and expected life span of the deceased
·
The adjuster to should
for any pre-existing health problems suffered by the deceased prior to the loss
·
The adjuster should
consult the family doctor for pre-existing health issues
·
The adjuster should
research how the pre-existing health issues might have affected the deceased's
life span
II.
Complete
work history of the deceased
·
When and where was the
deceased employed
·
Total earning capacity
·
Occupation
title/position
·
Absenteeism
·
Work performance
reviews
III.
Family
situation
·
Number of marriages
·
Current civil status
·
Number of dependants
(e.g. children, ailing parents, etc.)
·
Loss of house-hold
services due to the deceased's death; e.g. house-hold chores that the deceased
regularly undertook
IV.
Income
Tax Returns
·
Best to obtain the last
5 years of the deceased person's tax return
·
Determine the
"after tax" income of the deceased
·
Deductions of up to 30%
for the deceased's personal expenses
·
Take into consideration
factors like the surviving spouse may remarry
·
Funeral costs are paid
to the insured to the full limit of insurance
Damage
Summary for a Tort Injury Claim
Out-of-pocket
expenses
-
Examples are:
·
Ambulance
·
Prescription drugs
·
Home care
·
Transportation to
physiotherapy
Income
Replacement Benefits (IRB)
·
Weekly salary -> In
Ontario, standard IRB is 70% of gross income or $400/wk, whichever is less,
also there is a 7 day deductible
·
Modified salary
replacement if the claimant returns to work on a part-time basis
Permanent
Disability
·
Loss of competitive
advantage
·
Claimant is on modified
work duty and can no longer return to pre-accident work duties
·
Depending on the mobility
of the claimant and future loss income this value should be researched using
case law to support any settlement amount
Pain
and Suffering
·
This figure is much
more vague and open for interpretation
·
Best way to determine
this amount is researching case law, taking into consideration age of claimant,
type of accident, type of injury, and jurisdiction; these factors can influence the settlement
amount greatly
Protection
Against Fraud
-
Insurance fraud is a
serious criminal offense under Criminal Code of Canada and is punishable for up
to 10 years in prison for those who are convicted
-
In Ontario, it is an
offense to knowingly make a false/misleading statement or representation to an
insurer in connection with a person's entitlement to a benefit under a contract
of insurance
-
Also an offense is to
willfully fail to inform the insurer of a material change in circumstances
within 14 days
-
Another offense is to
make or use a false document with the intent that it be acted upon as
genuine; if the insured submits docs for
the support of a claim then the docs should be legitimate
-
Maximum fine, upon
conviction are $100,000 for the first conviction and $200,000 for any
subsequent conviction
Automobile
Accident Subrogation
-
When subrogation is a
possibility for a serious accident an outside expert is brought into evaluate,
produce, and preserve evidence of cause and fault
-
Example - A chemist
expert is used to evaluate the asphalt road.
The chemist shows the chemical composition of the roadway didn't meet
standards which resulted in the road to more slick approaching a bend. The chemist's findings help support the
insurer who paid the claim to successfully subrogate a partial amount against
the construction company who was awarded the contract to construct and pave the
road
-
Other possible reasons
the cause of the loss may include the following:
·
A stop sign was hidden
by a tree branch
·
Inadequate road signs
did not indicate that there was an upcoming bend in the road
·
The public roadway way
was in a very poor physical condition with potholes and obstructions in the
road
-
There is a possibility
that a public entity or someone else could be responsible for the condition of
the roadway and may bear some share of the liability; municipalities, through the law, have
shortened the time frame for a claimant to present a legal action against the
city
Example - in most cases a TP has 2 years to present a legal action against a tortfeasor, however if a municipality is to share the blame then the limitation could be reduced to a matter of weeks
Example - in most cases a TP has 2 years to present a legal action against a tortfeasor, however if a municipality is to share the blame then the limitation could be reduced to a matter of weeks
-
The right of a TP to
claim for injuries over and above statutory AB may be limited or reduced by
provincial legislation, as is the case in Ontario
Preliminary
Report Information
-
Information that should
be included in a loss report are:
·
Name & address of
insured
·
Driver's license #
·
Vehicle details
·
Policy number
·
Date, time and location
of accident
·
Police info, EMS info
and if any parties were taken from the scene by ambulance (ground/air)
·
Description of loss
details of the accident
·
Damages sustained by
the insured (BI and PD)
·
Identification of TPs
and passengers in all vehicles involved in the loss
·
Insurers and policy #s
for all persons suffering BI or PD due to the loss
·
Name and contact info
of witnesses
·
Name and contact info
of all parties who sustained injuries due to the loss
·
Location of property
after it was moved from the scene
·
Possibility of
subrogation against other tortfeasors
·
Contact info and name
of experts and their findings
Collateral
Benefits
-
The type of benefits
which can be deducted from an automobile settlement are collateral benefits
received from other sources, like employer benefits, workman's compensation,
short term disability, etc.
-
Some policies have a
clause that mandates a claimant must repay any duplicate payment
Example - Hugo was involved in a MVA where TP was unidentified. Hugo had his own auto policy and disability insurance through his employer. Hugo made a claim under both policies. The auto policy is secondary to any employer benefits and deducted any duplicate entitlements that Hugo had access to through his employer's policy; Hugo is to receive indemnity for his loss and profit from it
Example - Hugo was involved in a MVA where TP was unidentified. Hugo had his own auto policy and disability insurance through his employer. Hugo made a claim under both policies. The auto policy is secondary to any employer benefits and deducted any duplicate entitlements that Hugo had access to through his employer's policy; Hugo is to receive indemnity for his loss and profit from it
-
There are certain
provinces that have legislation in place allowing certain benefits to be
received from multiple policies without deductions
Example - Lisa is hurt in a MVA. Lisa's benefits under the policy were NOT deducted for her entitlements for her welfare payments and unemployment insurance
Example - Lisa is hurt in a MVA. Lisa's benefits under the policy were NOT deducted for her entitlements for her welfare payments and unemployment insurance
Releases
for Injury Claims
-
Signing a settlement release
has the effect of the claimant giving up his/her rights to present a legal
action today and in the future for BI and PD
-
Even if the claimant
signs a final release, his/her entitlement under AB is NOT affected
-
In Ontario the loss
adjuster should be prepared to warn a claimant to consider seeking legal,
financial, and medical advice before signing a release; the claimant has a two
(2) day cooling off period after a settlement release has been signed and the
claimant must be aware of his/her rights to dispute the settlement
-
If the claimant has
been informed of his/her rights and signs the release the insurer is NOT
required to provide a commuted value calculation to determine what the value is
now of what would have been the future benefits
Uninsured
Motorist (UIM) Claims
-
From time to time there
are motorists who operate vehicles and cause accidents when they don't have
auto insurance
-
UIM is coverage which
allows the insured (policy holder) to present a claim for BI and PD (depending
on the jurisdiction where the accident occurred) under their own policy when an
uninsured motorist is responsible for a MVA
-
Only in the case of BI
an insured can present a claim under UIM coverage for an unidentified motorist
who is liable for the MVA; liability is
difficult to assess because the other party is not available to verify or
refute the loss details presented by the insured
-
If the uninsured
motorist is known, the adjuster must verify that insurance did NOT exist on the
vehicle involved in the loss; this is
usually done by receiving a report (in ON it is called the Autoplus)
-
If the other party is
identified and confirmed uninsured then the coverage is limited to the minimum
TPL policy requirements in the jurisdiction where the MVA took place
Non-Owned
Auto Policy
-
This is an endorsement
available for purchase with the standard CGL policy
-
This endorsement covers
the liability imposed by law upon the insured arising from the use/operation of
any automobile that is not owned or licensed to the insured, in the course of
the insured's business; includes vicarious liability through the negligent act
of an employee
-
This endorsement will
cover the insured when an at-fault vehicle is uninsured or when an at-fault
vehicle is insured and the owner's policy has its limits exhausted due to the
BI and PD claim presented by the victim, as a result of the insured's and/or
his employee's negligence causing the MVA
Example - Insured owns Boss Repair shop in Toronto. After servicing one its client's vehicles an employee takes the vehicle for a test drive. While driving the client's vehicle the employee doesn't yield at a stop sign and collides with Anne who was on her way home. Anne suffers injuries and damage to her vehicle. Anne's vehicle is covered under her own policy, but her injuries are permanent and serious. She sues the owner of the vehicle for her BI. The owner's policy only has $200k TPL limits and Anne's BI claim is valued at $350k. Boss Repair shop has a CGL policy with a Non-Owned Auto rider which has TPL limits of $500k. Any balance that is not covered under the client's TPL limits auto policy will be paid by the TPL coverage under Boss Repair shop's CGL, Non-owned Auto endorsement coverage
Example - Insured owns Boss Repair shop in Toronto. After servicing one its client's vehicles an employee takes the vehicle for a test drive. While driving the client's vehicle the employee doesn't yield at a stop sign and collides with Anne who was on her way home. Anne suffers injuries and damage to her vehicle. Anne's vehicle is covered under her own policy, but her injuries are permanent and serious. She sues the owner of the vehicle for her BI. The owner's policy only has $200k TPL limits and Anne's BI claim is valued at $350k. Boss Repair shop has a CGL policy with a Non-Owned Auto rider which has TPL limits of $500k. Any balance that is not covered under the client's TPL limits auto policy will be paid by the TPL coverage under Boss Repair shop's CGL, Non-owned Auto endorsement coverage